EarthCube: a Community Project

earthcube_keywords

Last year, the National Science Foundation kicked off a project called EarthCube, pooling the work of data scientists and cyber scientists to make a comprehensive, holistic pool of earth, air and water data – easy to access and update – allowing the geoscience community to address the most challenging research questions about understanding and predicting the earth system. EarthCube has serious potential to transform how the Earth science research is conducted, and how it is taught in schools and universities.

Knowinnovation is stewarding the project by facilitating its major meetings, which involve over 200 people from the geo-science community, about a hundred of them present at the meeting venue, and the rest connected virtually. At the first event, which took place in November of 2011, KI worked closely with the NSF to chart the course for the 4-day event. When we met with them to plan for the second workshop last June, the NSF emphasized that they didn’t want to be in charge, that EarthCube – both the project and the meeting – should be community driven. Keep reading »

It’s Down to Preference

dragons_thumb

It happens once or twice a year. An innovation theorist, organizational consultant, or accredited author/blogger writes an article blasting some aspect of the collective creative process. There’s a flurry of responses and rebuttals, and a digging-in of the heels in each camp, those for or against, each with their own case for the best way to induce creative thinking.

The most recent example of this: a New York Times piece The Rise of New Groupthink, in which Susan Cain, author of Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World That Can’t Stop Talking, laments the prevalence of group brainstorming and creative teamwork. While she doesn’t entirely disavow the value of creative collaboration, her premise is that team methodology is counterproductive for introverts, to whom she attributes most creative advances. Keep reading »

Size Matters

flower_glass_window

A great deal of the work KI does to provoke innovation involves operating in groups and teams. We have nothing against individual genius; in fact we value and recognize that a single person’s vision can power an innovation effort. But in almost every field – and we work with many, from scientists, professors and teachers to marketing types or NGO field workers – it is more often the deliberate mixing of minds and talents that results in a tangible, innovative outcome.

Except group work can be clunky and cumbersome. You have to spend longer clarifying the objectives, aligning resources and getting people on board. Sometimes, it can seem nearly impossible to achieve the consensus necessary to advance within a task. Groups are a powerful mechanism to produce innovative solutions, but getting to that product can be arduous, particularly if it’s not well facilitated. Keep reading »

Page 1 of 11